2008-03-16
Cultural Heritage as economic driver in a post-industrial economy
Every time cultural heritage contributes to artistic, educational or social development, it is a source of value: esthetical value, experience value, existence value for which the production implies economic movement, and not to take this into consideration would lead to a lack of fundamental understanding.
When looking to set the value of cultural heritage objects we must make use of socioeconomic theory. Cultural heritage must be treated as a (consumable) good. Further, according to socio-economic theory, cultural heritage objects are COMMON GOODS. Common goods are characterised by being:
Non-exclusive: A good is non-exclusive when a user cannot technically be stopped from enjoying / consuming that good.
Non-rivalling: The enjoyment / consumption of the good for one user is not reduced by more persons enjoying it simultaneously.
Download: http://www.artsmanagement.net/downloads/nypan.pdf
Non-exclusive: A good is non-exclusive when a user cannot technically be stopped from enjoying / consuming that good.
Non-rivalling: The enjoyment / consumption of the good for one user is not reduced by more persons enjoying it simultaneously.
Download: http://www.artsmanagement.net/downloads/nypan.pdf
Dr. T. Nypan, Directorate for Cultural Heritage, Norway
There are no comments for this content yet.
similar content